{"id":5999,"date":"2020-12-03T06:27:47","date_gmt":"2020-12-03T06:27:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identitaet-der-begutachtenden-person\/"},"modified":"2021-06-10T08:29:46","modified_gmt":"2021-06-10T08:29:46","slug":"identity-of-the-reviewer","status":"publish","type":"kommentare","link":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/comments\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/","title":{"rendered":"Identity of the reviewer"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Confidentiality and neutrality in review and consultation are the basis of any honest judgement-forming process and are an inextricable part of the reviewer\u2019s or adviser\u2019s own identity. This is because academic expertise can only be properly assessed based on the knowledge and credentials of an individual. It is also vital that the person tasked with carrying out the review is the actual author of the review, not least when it comes to being able to judge any potential bias.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is more, protection of a research idea is a fundamental notion: it requires that the idea should be made known to as few people as possible. Therefore, anyone who has been asked to write a review does not have the authority to delegate this task to somebody else.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Confidentiality and neutrality in review and consultation are the basis of any honest assessment process and are an inextricable part of the reviewer\u2019s or adviser\u2019s own identity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","kommentar_cats":[257],"kommentar_tags":[178,180,179,256],"class_list":["post-5999","kommentare","type-kommentare","status-publish","hentry","kommentar_cats-general","kommentar_tags-conflict-of-interest-bias-favouritism","kommentar_tags-professional-ethics","kommentar_tags-review-process","kommentar_tags-scientific-misconduct"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Identity of the reviewer - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Confidentiality and neutrality in review and consultation are the basis of any honest assessment process and are an inextricable part of the reviewer\u2019s or adviser\u2019s own identity.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Identity of the reviewer - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Confidentiality and neutrality in review and consultation are the basis of any honest assessment process and are an inextricable part of the reviewer\u2019s or adviser\u2019s own identity.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-10T08:29:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/dfg-wissenschaftliche-integritaet-defaultimage.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2324\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1474\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/kommentare\\\/identity-of-the-reviewer\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/kommentare\\\/identity-of-the-reviewer\\\/\",\"name\":\"Identity of the reviewer - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-03T06:27:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-10T08:29:46+00:00\",\"description\":\"Confidentiality and neutrality in review and consultation are the basis of any honest assessment process and are an inextricable part of the reviewer\u2019s or adviser\u2019s own identity.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/kommentare\\\/identity-of-the-reviewer\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/kommentare\\\/identity-of-the-reviewer\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/kommentare\\\/identity-of-the-reviewer\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Identity of the reviewer\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t\",\"description\":\"Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/GWP-Logo-v20200213@2x.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/GWP-Logo-v20200213@2x.png\",\"width\":252,\"height\":70,\"caption\":\"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V.\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Identity of the reviewer - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","description":"Confidentiality and neutrality in review and consultation are the basis of any honest assessment process and are an inextricable part of the reviewer\u2019s or adviser\u2019s own identity.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Identity of the reviewer - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","og_description":"Confidentiality and neutrality in review and consultation are the basis of any honest assessment process and are an inextricable part of the reviewer\u2019s or adviser\u2019s own identity.","og_url":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/","og_site_name":"Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","article_modified_time":"2021-06-10T08:29:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2324,"height":1474,"url":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/dfg-wissenschaftliche-integritaet-defaultimage.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/","url":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/","name":"Identity of the reviewer - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-03T06:27:47+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-10T08:29:46+00:00","description":"Confidentiality and neutrality in review and consultation are the basis of any honest assessment process and are an inextricable part of the reviewer\u2019s or adviser\u2019s own identity.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/kommentare\/identity-of-the-reviewer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Identity of the reviewer"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/","name":"Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","description":"Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/#organization","name":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V.","url":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/GWP-Logo-v20200213@2x.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/GWP-Logo-v20200213@2x.png","width":252,"height":70,"caption":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kommentare\/5999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kommentare"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kommentare"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kommentare\/5999\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6697,"href":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kommentare\/5999\/revisions\/6697"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kommentar_cats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kommentar_cats?post=5999"},{"taxonomy":"kommentar_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kommentar_tags?post=5999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}