ForewordPreamble

Principles

Guideline 1: Commitment to the general principlesGuideline 2: Professional ethicsGuideline 3: Organisational responsibility of heads of research institutionsGuideline 4: Responsibility of the heads of research work unitsGuideline 5: Dimensions of performance and assessment criteriaGuideline 6: Ombudspersons

Research Process

Guideline 7: Cross-phase quality assuranceGuideline 8: Stakeholders, responsibilities and rolesGuideline 9: Research design

 

Guideline 10: Legal and ethical frameworks, usage rightsGuideline 11: Methods and standardsGuideline 12: DocumentationGuideline 13: Providing public access to research resultsGuideline 14: AuthorshipGuideline 15: Publication mediumGuideline 16: Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussionsGuideline 17: Archiving

Non-Compliance with Good Research Practice, Procedures

Guideline 18: Complainants and respondentsGuideline 19: Procedures in cases of alleged research misconductImplementation of the Guidelines
ForewordPreamblePrinzipienGuideline 1: Commitment to the general principlesGuideline 2: Professional ethicsGuideline 3: Organisational responsibility of heads of research institutionsGuideline 4: Responsibility of the heads of research work unitsGuideline 5: Dimensions of performance and assessment criteriaGuideline 6: OmbudspersonsForschungsprozessGuideline 7: Cross-phase quality assuranceGuideline 8: Stakeholders, responsibilities and rolesGuideline 9: Research designGuideline 10: Legal and ethical frameworks, usage rightsGuideline 11: Methods and standardsGuideline 12: DocumentationGuideline 13: Providing public access to research resultsGuideline 14: AuthorshipGuideline 15: Publication mediumGuideline 16: Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussionsGuideline 17: ArchivingNichtbeachtung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis, VerfahrenGuideline 18: Complainants and respondentsGuideline 19: Procedures in cases of alleged research misconductImplementation of the Guidelines
Keyword Index
The Code of Conduct
| Print

Keyword index

13 results for the keyword "public access"

Reusable and open methods and protocols in the life sciences

19.03.2025 – Recommendations for detailed recording of research methods

Comment on: GL11 (Life sciences) , GL12 (Life sciences) , GL13 (Life sciences)

Publication of scientific results in preprints

19.03.2025 – Preprints are academic publications that are published without peer review, thereby allowing for the rapid dissemination of research results.

Comment on: GL13 (General) , GL15 (General)

Utilisation of existing data sets in medicine/the life sciences

30.09.2024 – Both the secondary utilisation of collected research data and the use of routine data are essential components of compatible and resource-saving research practice. Access to the data is a fundamental requirement, but it is equally important for ...

Comment on: GL9 (Life sciences) , GL10 (Life sciences) , GL11 (Life sciences)

Open Science as Part of Research Culture. Positioning of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)

19.06.2023 – In its position paper entitled “Open Science as Part of Research Culture”, the DFG sets out its existing positions on the issue of open science and examines the potential and challenges involved. From the DFG’s point of view, while open science – ...

Comment on: GL7 (Statements) , GL13 (Statements)

Publication organs in open access

13.04.2023 – Open access publications ensure permanent and free access to research results for readers.

Comment on: GL15 (General)

Academic publishing as a foundation and area of leverage for research assessment

25.11.2022 – The DFG has responded to developments in the field of academic publishing with its position paper “Academic Publishing as a Foundation and Area of Leverage for Research Assessment”.

Comment on: GL13 (Statements)

Restrictions on the publication of source codes

03.12.2020 – Restrictions on making source code publicly available may exist for copyright reasons. It can be useful to differentiate between the underlying algorithms and the source code.

Comment on: GL13 (General)

Further links relating to legal and ethical frameworks, usage rights

03.12.2020 – Disclaimer: The selection of links provided here does not claim to be exhaustive. They are examples. The editors welcome suggestions for the inclusion of further examples.

Comment on: GL10 (Link list)

What is the correct interpretation of the sentence: “Software programmed by researchers themselves is made publicly available along with the source code”?

03.12.2020 – The sentence “Software programmed by researchers themselves is made publicly available along with the source code” is intrinsically linked to the concept of enabling public availability as introduced in Guideline 7 (“Cross-phase quality ...

Comment on: GL13 (General)

Further links on making research results publicly accessible

03.12.2020 – Sammlung externer Links zum Themenkomplex.

Comment on: GL13 (Link list)

Making research results available

03.12.2020 – Research results are often unique or consist of large amounts of data. Both make fully comprehensive provision difficult.

Comment on: GL13 (Engineering/engineering sciences)

Possible reasons for restricting the publication of research results

03.12.2020 – One reason for not making results publicly available may be that researchers do not hold the sole rights to the research results.

Comment on: GL13 (General)

Further links on the subject of cross-phase quality assurance

03.12.2020 – Collection of external links on the subject

Comment on: GL7 (Link list)

|