ForewordPreamble

Principles

Guideline 1: Commitment to the general principlesGuideline 2: Professional ethicsGuideline 3: Organisational responsibility of heads of research institutionsGuideline 4: Responsibility of the heads of research work unitsGuideline 5: Dimensions of performance and assessment criteriaGuideline 6: Ombudspersons

Research Process

Guideline 7: Cross-phase quality assuranceGuideline 8: Stakeholders, responsibilities and rolesGuideline 9: Research design

 

Guideline 10: Legal and ethical frameworks, usage rightsGuideline 11: Methods and standardsGuideline 12: DocumentationGuideline 13: Providing public access to research resultsGuideline 14: AuthorshipGuideline 15: Publication mediumGuideline 16: Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussionsGuideline 17: Archiving

Non-Compliance with Good Research Practice, Procedures

Guideline 18: Complainants and respondentsGuideline 19: Procedures in cases of alleged research misconductImplementation of the Guidelines
ForewordPreamblePrinzipienGuideline 1: Commitment to the general principlesGuideline 2: Professional ethicsGuideline 3: Organisational responsibility of heads of research institutionsGuideline 4: Responsibility of the heads of research work unitsGuideline 5: Dimensions of performance and assessment criteriaGuideline 6: OmbudspersonsForschungsprozessGuideline 7: Cross-phase quality assuranceGuideline 8: Stakeholders, responsibilities and rolesGuideline 9: Research designGuideline 10: Legal and ethical frameworks, usage rightsGuideline 11: Methods and standardsGuideline 12: DocumentationGuideline 13: Providing public access to research resultsGuideline 14: AuthorshipGuideline 15: Publication mediumGuideline 16: Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussionsGuideline 17: ArchivingNichtbeachtung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis, VerfahrenGuideline 18: Complainants and respondentsGuideline 19: Procedures in cases of alleged research misconductImplementation of the Guidelines
Keyword Index
The Code of Conduct
| Print

Comments - Practical examples (7)

Data transfer when moving to a different institution

03.12.2020 – If a researcher wishes to continue using research data they have collected when they move to a different institution, this may be prohibited by former superiors such as the group leader or institute management.

Comment on: GL10 (Practical examples)

Handling research software – case studies

03.12.2020 – Based on practical examples, the handling of research software is explained in the fields of theoretical chemistry and theoretical physics.

Comment on: GL13 (General) , GL13 (Practical examples)

Case study: Lack of confidentiality in the review process

03.12.2020 – Scientific misconduct by a reviewer

Comment on: GL16 (Practical examples)

Case study – Inadmissible “honorary authorships”

03.12.2020 – Examples of inadmissible honorary authorships

Comment on: GL14 (Practical examples)

Example – “Conflict of authorship: a co-author disagrees with the order in which contributions are listed in publication”

03.12.2020 – There are three typical constellations here

Comment on: GL14 (Practical examples)

Case study – Conflict of authorship: Presumption of authorship

03.12.2020 – Dealing with conflicts of authorship: co-authors state that a person is claiming authorship to which they are not entitled. An example here is in the case of collaboration between the life sciences/natural sciences and the humanities: in the field of ...

Comment on: GL14 (Practical examples)

Contributions that do not establish authorship

03.12.2020 – Examples of contributions that do not justify authorship.

Comment on: GL14 (Practical examples)

General (58)

Research areas

Humanities and social sciences (5)Engineering/engineering sciences (20)Life sciences (21)Natural sciences (30)
Practical examples (7)
Legal Framework (3)
faq (10)
Link list (18)
Statements (14)
|